Just wanna scroll the news? Take the pill 💊
All providers + tooling
Frameworksfree tier

Steel

Lighter alternative to Anchor for performance-sensitive programs.

Visit official site Last reviewed 10 Jun 2026

Best for

Programs where compiled binary size and CU usage matter more than ergonomics.

Pros

  • Smaller binaries than Anchor
  • Closer to native Solana

Cons

  • Smaller ecosystem and tooling
  • Steeper learning curve

Steel is a lightweight alternative to Anchor by Regolith Labs. The pitch: Anchor's ergonomics, native Solana's performance.

The problem Steel solves

Anchor is great until your program's binary gets big and your CU budget gets tight. Steel rebuilds the developer-ergonomics part (account validation, instruction dispatch, error handling) on top of native Solana primitives, with smaller compiled output.

What you get

  • Smaller binaries. Programs compile down to 30–50% smaller than the equivalent Anchor program.
  • Lower CU usage. Less generated code means fewer cycles spent on framework overhead.
  • Native compatibility. Steel programs interop with native Solana programs cleanly.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller community. Far fewer Stack Overflow answers, blog posts, examples.
  • No IDL generation parity yet. Anchor's TypeScript client generation is mature; Steel's tooling is still building.
  • Steeper learning curve. If you're new to Solana programs, learn Anchor first.

When to use Steel

  • Programs where CU budget matters (high-frequency trading, MEV, DEX inner loops)
  • Teams that already understand Solana's account model deeply
  • You're rewriting a hot path of an Anchor program for performance

Resources

Building on Solana?

Protocol launches, tooling releases, and ecosystem moves — the news that affects what you're shipping. Free, unsubscribe anytime.

Other frameworks